Originally, it seems reasonable to distinguish between services and different charges. What makes people uncomfortable is: Obviously the other party violates the tobacco control regulations and endangers my health, but I must abide by the law and evade and save money to buy a clean room! Businesses make money regardless of right and wrong. It should not be embarrassing to make game rules and to govern justice. In my opinion, this kind of “discrimination†of businesses should be stopped as soon as possible, because the business is obliged to provide consumers with a smoke-free consumer environment for free, at least, this is suspected of mandatory consumption. Of course, if you want to avoid a strong business rebound, you may wish to change the rules of the game requiring diners sitting in smoking areas to pay a "pollution fee", so that the area of ​​tea or service fees slightly higher, as a transitional approach .
Of course, these are still only temporary measures. On occasions when people smoke, the scale has thickened. Although in today's coastal cities, the number of smokers in buses, shopping malls, etc. has greatly decreased, but in most inland areas, the awareness of “smoking hampers others†is still about zero; even coastal cities, restaurants, train stations, Internet cafes and even hospitals, where no one else can be seen everywhere. Nothing can be traced back to the "tobacco finances" in various places. Just think, the tobacco industry is still a "milk cow". The intrinsic value chain is not cut off, and the difficulty of implementing the bottleneck in the control of tobacco in all places is not expected.
Electronic Chemicals,99.8% Cas 7553-56-2,Iodine Crystal 99.8% Cas 7553-56-2,Iodine Crystal 99.8%
Henan Tianfu Chemical Co.,Ltd , https://www.hnphotoinitiators.com